Individual Annotated Bibliography (IAB) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Individual (IAB) - Annotated Bibliography pillow slips a need for standards to govern ethics in business so that whenever we feel that an judicature has done something wrong, we can have a valid rationale, as well as a systematic and widely understandable point of argument.Andrew Crane is a Professor of railway line Ethics at the civilize of Business in Schulich. He joined the school in January of 2007. He has also been the Chair of Business Ethics of the International Center for Corporate Social Responsibility (ICSSR) in Nottingham Business School. Before that, he had been at Cardiff University here, he had been involved in the setting up of BRASS. With all these credentials, this is a very presumable author whose insight cannot be brushed aside for anything else.These authors discuss the main honourable theories and their potential and rate for business ethics. In looking at ethical theories, they suggest two perspectives from which to look at it. These imply ethical relat ivism and ethical absolutism. These authors argue that, for the purposes and reasons of practical decision making in business, the theories of ethical absolutism and ethical relativism do necessarily make for positions that are particularly useful. For them, pluralism is the answer to the problems related to business ethics. Pluralism, as they explain, occupies the halfway ground between relativism and absolutism.According to the pluralism point of view that these authors vouch for, different moral backgrounds and convictions are acceptable, and at the same time, a consensus in rules and basic principles in certain contexts in social domains deserve to be reached. Further on, these authors provide a line of thought that states that in business there is just social welfare and harm to define morality. They get this statement from Kaler (1999). According to it, wrong and right are mainly to do with providing benefits and aiming to avoid harm at all times.The authors also criticize t he egoistic theory of ethics. They state that the theory can and may only