Jury Deliberation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Jury Deliberation - Essay Example investigate in this instance could be wide and varied in meaning as there argon other extrapolating questions with regards to control board deliberation itself. Are questions limited to the AC 1118 (protection of free debate in the jury room) only Are there other contradicting details about the jury process which the public mustiness know and that should be properly acted upon Does research apply to the outsiders, or the jurors themselvesAs Section 8(1) of the Contempt of administration Act 1981 provides (1) Subject to subsection (2) below, it is a contempt of court to obtain, disclose or solicit whatever severiculars of statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced or votes cast by members of a jury in the course of their deliberations in every legal proceedings, making votes, discussions and other related issues on jury deliberations sacrosanct before the fair play.In this instance, it is against the law that jurors themselves impar t any information or knowledge with regards to the case at hand, so that they are to reside life alike(p) the case does not exist at all. And this is to allow implementation of AC 1118, of which whitethorn be interpreted as to protect the jurors, or the court decision, and the public in general.Court cases that stool touched on the issue of protection of free debate in the jury room include Regina v. ... ion why or how come that in those cases where the court was informed of some misconduct on the part of jurors, steps were not done to rectify what has gone wrong (UKP, 2006). In the R v Mirza (2004) case, AC 1118 was besides indicated of important clause as an important feature of the jurys work protecting individual jurors from image to pressure to explain the reasons which had actuated them individually to arrive at their verdict, (House of Lords, 2005). Likewise, R v Young Stephen (Bar Council, 2006) has also been mentioned as one of the most notorious case. Incidentally, i t was emphasized in a report that section 8 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 on disclosing or obtaining information relating to jury room deliberations were addressed to tercet parties (Procter, 2006) in the discussion mentioned. One example of this contradictory deliberation was the case Her Majestys Attorney General (Respondent) v. Scotcher (Appellant) (Criminal accumulation from Her Majestys High Court of Justice) of which one Keith Scotcher has been charged of contempt of court.In the deliberation, it was established that appellant Scotcher was summoned for jury proceeds in January 2000 for a case against two brothers criminally charged. In February 20 of that same year, an anonymous letter was sent to the mother of the two defendants in the criminal case of which contents include among others Dear Mrs AndersonI was the one jury member who held out against theprosecution case at the trial of A and B. I would likeyou to seriously consider, as Im sure you are already,talking t o your counsels about appealing the convictionson the grounds of an unsecured conviction, miscarriage ofjustice, or whatever. XXXXWhen we first went out the voting was close XXXX.Many changed their vote